Before
getting into facilitation procedures, you should know that the
facilitation of a forum comprises a number of different roles.
Ideally,
a facilitation team comprises one person per role, but in certain
cases, one person can play more than one role.
These roles are the
following (Ø
mandatory; #
strongly advised; @ advised):
Ø
facilitation
This is
obviously the facilitator’s main role. Comparable to the chair in a
face-to-face meeting, the forum facilitator introduces the
discussion, gives the floor, asks questions, and keeps an eye on the
calendar and objectives. This role can be shared by all the members
of the Facilitation team in its aspects of raising questions, asking
for specifics, and giving the floor,
but only one person should be in charge of monitoring the
deadlines defined in the working calendar and making sure these are
met.
This role is
comparable to the person, in a face-to-face meeting, panel, or round
table, who keeps an eye on the clock and makes sure all the
agreed-upon discussion subjects are covered. We can call this person
the “chief facilitator.”
Ø
behind-the-scenes facilitation
Because of
its importance, we point to this as a specific role although it is
actually part of basic facilitation, and can and should be shared by
all the members of the Facilitation team. It consists in contacting
participants or potential participants through private messages to
encourage them to contribute to the discussion.
Ø
subscription and management of Web-based interface of the
mailing-list software (in our case, "sympa,” see Chapter II,
"… set up the tools for the forum")
Subscriptions,
unsubscriptions, checking for e-mail errors, this is an indispensable
task. The person in charge of it should also be able to publish the
summaries on the Web site, as well as all the other elements that it
was decided should be available on the Web site (see below, "setting
up a collaborative Web site").
Ø
moderation
Whether the forum is
moderated “at the source” or “in progress” (see Chapter VI),
this role is mandatory. Its purpose is to make sure all the
participants comply with the working rules (see 2
Forum-rules.txt, 2 Layout.txt and,
if needed, 2Translation.txt).
Ø
translation
This role is
mandatory when there is more than one working language. See Chapter
III for the different translation options.
The person who fills this role must have the profile of a
bilingual / trilingual facilitator, rather than that of a translator.
Lightly edited translation (Level 1, see Chapter IV) requires having
to make some quick choices in terms of the topics and the
participants, which requires a strong involvement in the facilitation
process. "True" translators find it hard to settle for
less-than-perfect, as they are trained to provide good translations.
# or Ø writing
of summaries
An e-forum is usually
“open,” that is, new participants can join the discussion in
progress. For such persons to be able to catch up quickly on the
progress of the discussion, it is strongly advised to make summaries
of the discussions available on a regular basis (weekly or bimonthly,
or weekly and monthly, for example, depending on the duration and the
pace of the discussion).
When “non connected”
persons are participating (see Chapter VII) writing and translating,
and sending of summaries becomes mandatory, because such persons will
not receive all the daily messages, just summaries of them.
These summaries are published on the list but should also
appear in a “summaries” section on the forum Web site, so they
are quickly accessible.
Another factor is that
forum participants, however long the forum lasts, are usually very
taken by their everyday work. Summaries allow them to take up the
discussion without having to read all the messages that escaped them.
# setting up a collaborative Web site
Besides the usual Web
interface attached to a mailing-list software program (see http://www.forums.alliance21.org/info/babel
for an example of the one provided by "sympa"), it is
highly recommended to obtain the services of a Webmaster to set up a
collaborative-type Web site, such as "spip."
Awele's offers include setting up a spip Web site for you. The content of this type of Web site can be added to by anyone who is
given the right to do so in a few easy steps without their having to
learn any specific Web-related skill (html publication, for
instance). It can be divided into per-language sections, each
language section featuring relevant subsections : introductions of
participants, the messages (or just their abstracts) contributed to
the debate, summaries of the debate, reference documents,
conclusions, etc. Keep in mind that the more complex and complete you
wish your Web site to be, the more time-consuming this part of the
job will be!
The
forum facilitators can thus fill the different sections themselves
with the ongoing content produced by the forum, thus providing
participants with the possibility of browsing through the debate with
a clear and pleasant tool to do so. At the end of the debate, the
whole process is thus already organized and available to the public.
# regulation
This is
actually one of the moderation roles, applicable in the case of
moderation at the source (see Chapter VI). We present it as a
separate role because it is important. Messages to a forum often
arrive in “reams.” When a participant receives a lot of messages
in one blow, it is very likely that he/she won't have the time to
read them and will be unwilling to do so. It is therefore advisable,
in order to facilitate everyone’s regular participation and
therefore a true dialogue, for the moderator to publish the messages
in their order of arrival, but at a rate of 3 or 4 messages / day at
the most.
@ watchtower
This role is
very useful in certain types of forum. It consists in monitoring the
events relevant to the topic of discussion and informing the forum of
them. This can be a role shared by participants who have volunteered
to do so. It can be a "heavy" role (systematic proactive
research) or a "light" role (information as it comes)
depending on how important it is for your discussion.
These functions do not
require one person per role. You will distribute the roles
according to the number of people that make up your team. Here are
some indications:
Only one person is
“chief facilitator.” His/her main role is to make sure, with
regard to the participants as well as to the Facilitation team,
that the discussion, and all of its components (translations,
summaries, the introduction of a new topic, etc.) progress according
to the time defined by the calendar.
Only one person
introduces and concludes the discussion on one topic, as well as
encouraging the completion of discussion of a topic through
occasional messages to point out, for instance, that such-or-such
aspect still needs discussion, there is still strong disagreement on
such-or-such a point, there is only so much time left before
conclusion, etc.
The Facilitation
team as a whole can facilitate the debate in terms of the content,
raise questions, and rekindle the discussion. The entire team is
also in charge of contacting participants outside the forum (through
private messages) to encourage them to contribute to the debate.
This requires internal coordination. For messages from the
Facilitation team to the forum, all messages should be sent for
publication to the moderator, who is in charge of publishing them.
Messages to participants outside forum should be copied to the rest
of the team members to keep them informed and avoid two persons'
doing the same thing.
With
all this in mind, and as an example,
…
if you have a team of two persons:
one person is chief
facilitator, moderator, and translator, and manages the mailing-list
Web interface
the other person
introduces and concludes on the topics, writes summaries, plays the
watchtower, and transfers the content to the public (collaborative)
Web site
all the other
facilitation aspects are shared by both
…
you can also get participants involved …
for
example, you can get participants, in turn, to write summaries, to
introduce and to conclude on a topic, and/or to play the watchtower
role.
Your role, as facilitator, is to make sure that all these roles
are assigned explicitly within a team, possibly by involving
participants of the forum.
What follows should go
without saying, but we shall be explicit about it:
All the members of the Facilitation team should know and
understand the debating topics in depth. If this is not the case,
then it should be true for at least whomever is in charge of
introducing, exploring, and concluding on a topic, but this does not
excuse all the other members from having a good understanding of the
topic and of what is at stake in the debate.